Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on society is negative, while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Everyone needs to relax and enjoy; entertainment is the best suited for the purpose. However, some people thinks that entertainer have a positive effect and deserve the money they paid, while other disagree. I believe that they have more negative effect on the society compare to positive, but i will discuss the both views.
People who says entertainer have positive impact is primary due to the reason because they act role model for many people. We have come across various stories of the struggle and the hard work they did, to reach new heights of their career. Due to this, youngsters are always motivated as they have keep believing "everything is possible". Although they earn high salaries, they career span is limited until someone overtakes them. Therefore, the high earning are justified seeing on the career path.
The others disagree with the above notion and says they have a negative impact on society as they have their own valid reasons. The most basic one, will be the influence entertainer leaves on the young generation and that too not on good side mostly. We often seen that youngster had encounter serious accidents in order to copy a stunt from movie. Moreover, the fashionable stuff they promote in movies and magazine also have negative impact have negative impact, as it diverts their mind from education. Due to aforementioned reasons the high salaries they get are not justified.
I believe that, entertainers are not paid high wages considering the ill effects they have on the society. The programs which gives us Knowledge and entertains as well should be encouraged.
In conclusion, entertainment is necessary, but we should take the positive out of it. Government should check the content and parents as well need to supervise the children. There should be a rule or standard salary slabs in order of the contribution towards welfare of society by an entertainer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-11 | tarundhammi733 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...on the society compare to positive, but i will discuss the both views. People ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10476190476 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74774696409 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0334341904 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38248738028 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109173716759 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10527384924 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206228698648 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11373127072 0.056905535591 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.