Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is thought by some people that celebrities’ maintenance of world’ charity organizations encourage population to pay attention to problems. However, there is controversial meaning, which implies that famous people can’t affect these problems. I strongly believe that rich and famous people shouldn’t be lackadaisical and should to participate in charity organizations, as their attendance is very important.
First of all, famous people have same feelings as a common people. It doesn’t matter what sort of help they can provide, because helping each other is our duty, without taking into account a social status. Secondly, it’ well-known fact that celebrities have their own amounts of fans, who totally support their idols. To give a clear example, Ozzy Osbourne, the famous rock-singer, five years ago participated in footage dedicated to support Armenian orphanage to help children living without parents. Before that the economic status was very low due political unrest and instability in country, however after the advertisement, Ozzy Osbourne’s fans instantly collected great deal of money.
On the other hand, in the modern world we can observe many cases when someone tries to increase own rate using such aid organizations. Sorry to say, there are a lot of liars and frauds among famous people. They are ready to pretend that they care about help someone and not apathetic to environment. But, the purposes of participation in charity are money and fame. Thus, such false activists have coursed too much damage to Ukrainian economic development. Modern politicians tend to conquer votes of population by charity organizations support, however the main reason is only to encourage people to support a particular political party.
In conclusion, despite that fact that celebrities’ involvement in aid organizations could be used in personal interests and lead to deception of people, these participation is very efficient way to help indigent people to overcome the obstacles and should be used among famous people.
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for you kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken.Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter:describe the problem with the equipment.explain what happened when you phoned the 84
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and examples 87
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Your friend wants to send her his children to your house for the weekend Write a letter to him her and say Agree to this arrangement Say what time is suitable for you Describe what you are planning to do 57
- Write a letter to the hotel manager to make arrangements for hosting a party for one of your friends In your letter tell the manager about the reason for the party explain what requirements you have ask about the availability of facilities and the menu 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this participation' or 'these participations'?
Suggestion: this participation; these participations
...erests and lead to deception of people, these participation is very efficient way to help indigent ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'sort of', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26455026455 0.247107183377 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.150793650794 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.111111111111 0.0946595960268 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396825396825 0.0501214627716 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031746031746 0.0437548338989 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10582010582 0.122226691241 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0238095238095 0.0403226058552 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.17319016173 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0449735449735 0.0326793684256 138% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0502645502646 0.0861772015684 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015873015873 0.021408717616 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010582010582 0.011925033212 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2070.0 1933.35771543 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.57142857143 6.12580529183 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.431746031746 0.374742101984 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.28420135186 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231746031746 0.203846283523 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171428571429 0.137316102897 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17319016173 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.037074148 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615873015873 0.56093040696 110% => OK
Word variations: 71.1088183801 60.7387585426 117% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0866031065 49.517814964 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 127.492653851 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 54.3333333333 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.77380952381 1.69124875643 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31106270273 0.332605444948 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0879540197169 0.102741220458 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0576753686324 0.0668466124924 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505773600459 0.534860350844 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173884378768 0.148594505496 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119467310695 0.134430193775 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712848097747 0.0742795772207 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.311422185679 0.324371583561 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0262117124708 0.0638462369009 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219580845528 0.228012699653 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595632522375 0.058150111329 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.