Some people believe that hosting International sports events is highly beneficial whereas others think it is creating problems for the host country Discuss both the views

Essay topics:

‘Some people believe that hosting International sports events is highly beneficial, whereas others think it is creating problems for the host country’
Discuss both the views.

In this contemporary era, hosting an international sports event is in trend. There are many advantages to hosting an event. However, some of the countries believe that hosting sports events has its consequences and this is quite debatable. This essay will discuss both views.

Needless to say, hosting an event has its benefits. First, to host an international event, the government tends to renovate sports grounds and many other sporting facilities. This action leads to creating many job opportunities for local people. This will enable the source of income for many families. Secondly, many tourists will come to the hosting nation to support their country or to support their favourite team. For example, in 2011 India hosted the cricket world cup and to witness the final match so many cricket fans came to India to support their favourite team. It is beneficial for local tourism. Tourists will need an accommodation to stay for the event and it directly affects the hospitality industry and it will help them to increase their revenue. Tourists will be able to learn about the country's culture and its people. By hosting an international event, it will help countries to boost their economy.

On the other hand, some countries think that hosting an international event is a threat to national security. Many tourists will come to events to support their country and there are chances that a threat like a terrorist attack may occur and to prevent that high security will be in need. The government will spend an abundant amount of money to renovate sports grounds or maintain high security for the tourists and other international sportspersons. Instead of spending that much amount of money on an event, the government can use that money to help their local people by spending money on child development and their education.
I reckon that everything has its own consequences so rather than looking at the negative effect we should be looking up to the bright side of an event. I believe hosting an event has immense benefits compared to its disadvantage.
To conclude, hosting an international event such as sports enables various opportunities to boost a country's economy. By neglecting some negative side people should welcome the brighter side of an international sports event.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-09 krishyparms 74 view
Essays by user krishyparms :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...dvantages to hosting an event. However, some of the countries believe that hosting sports e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
...l for local tourism. Tourists will need an accommodation to stay for the event and it directly a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st their economy. On the other hand, some countries think that hosting an int...
^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g that much amount of money on an event, the government can use that money to hel...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i reckon, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11968085106 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79172606798 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441489361702 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2322062179 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363111765051 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136780328712 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851702562862 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228177673496 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774271390083 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.