Some people believe that the most effective way to tackle industrial pollution is to tax factories generating it. Others say there are alternatives to handle it. Discuss both sides and provide your opinion.
There is no doubt that, nowadays, pollution is becoming a global issue. Although some people believe that the most vital step to encounter the increasing industrial pollution from factories would be to implement taxes on them, others disagree and hold the opinion that methods other this are better suited to minimize this type of pollution. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of this argument and explain my support for the former view.
On the one hand, those who believe that tax should not be imposed on the factories may argue it can cause economic downfall. This is because doing so would force the companies to minimize their workforce, by letting go of their employees, in order to maximize their profit. This would result in more unemployment and thus effecting the economy in a negative way. Therefore, other pollution control methods such as the use of material things can be effective in decreasing the pollution. For instance, a clothing factory, which often causes a lot of air pollution, should be encouraged to use a filter over their chimney, regularly emitting dangerous smoke and dust particles in the atmosphere. This is likely to reduce the amount of air pollution caused by the factory.
On the other hand, however, taxing factories can be beneficial as it forces them to be more efficient. For example, consider a company that produces 1000 items per day with 5% of them being faulty. If a tax is imposed to this factory for the amount of waste products produced, it would naturally force them to be more efficient. Therefore, imposing taxes on factories may result in cutting the amount of pollution caused significantly.
Although, taxing can be good as it could improve the efficiency of a factory, I believe that not introducing taxes on factories is a better way to solve the pollution problem. This is because other options like the use of a filter are better as it usually does not impact the country’s economy.
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respo 56
- In many countries, as people are earning more these days they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people believe that the most effective way to tackle industrial pollution is to tax factories generating it. Others say there are alternatives to handle it. Discuss both sides and provide your opinion. 73
- In many countries as people are earning more these days they are also spending money in buying more and more items Do you think it is a positive or negative development 77
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respo 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ployment and thus effecting the economy in a negative way. Therefore, other pollution control met...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ons like the use of a filter are better as it usually does not impact the country&...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95151515152 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71765982623 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2067703857 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192021975665 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689269644571 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592687154467 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131643692884 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554847792444 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.