Some people opine that these days people have excessive options. I completely agree that nowadays people have too many options which is mainly caused by the rapid technology advancement.
Firstly, the rapid advancement of technology has caused so many options to emerge, which then lead people to be lazy. This is because, they are no longer need to make a lot of efforts to get something that they want. A lot of innovations that emerge as a product of rapid technology advancement have helped people to get what they want in an easy way. For instance, there are currently a lot of online food delivery services which offer different vendors and different price range. As a result, people no longer need to shop for groceries and cook to eat something that they want to eat. They can just get it easily from those online food delivery services.
Secondly, rapid technology advancement have created a lot of options which makes people become confused. There are so many choices for almost product category, from clothes, kitchen appliances to technology gadgets. This makes choosing process becomes tiring and confusing because usually those products are quite similar. For example, a guy want to buy a new blue jeans through online shopping application. When he opens the application, there are so many brands and vendors which sell the blue jeans that he is looking for. As a result, buying process becomes so long and confusing for that guy.
In conclusion, I completely agree that nowadays people have too many options which is mainly caused by the rapid technology advancement because technology advancement has made people to be lazier, and has made people to be confused in choosing what they want due to the excessive options that emerge.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 56
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ave helped people to get what they want in an easy way. For instance, there are currently a lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'jean'?
Suggestion: jean
...r example, a guy want to buy a new blue jeans through online shopping application. Wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01369863014 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59727255647 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465753424658 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.575450431 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188843055536 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704509342761 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743938314182 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157602291569 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910909549971 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.