There are people who believe that the only thing to consider when buying something should be the price. I do not seem to agree with this opinion because there are definitely other things that need consideration while wanting to purchase anything.
First, it is a good idea to check out for the quality of what you want to buy and not only considering the price alone. The quality check would ensure that the product bought is durable. Also, it would serve as a guide to know how long it would last and wether it will serve its purpose. For instance, when a company wants to buy chairs to keep for their clients in the waiting room, the quality of the seats are a very important factor to look out for. In addition, it is expedient to know if we really need what we want to buy once we understand the motive behind the purchase. For example, people who have projects to conclude would hear about a new trending mobile phone and would end up ordering it out of excitement.
Secondly, only the consideration of the price of something whenever it is about to be bought is not a positive action. In our world today, countries spend a lot of money buying nuclear weapons whose destruction rates are so powerful. Truly, the first thing to think about before buying nuclear warheads should be the negative impact it would bring to the society at large, yet these leaders think the opposite. How would a person with conscience think about only the price in the situation above?
In conclusion, saying that prices of things should be the only consideration before purchase, after positive facts have been brought to your notice is not a good development. I implore everyone to consider everything considerable before buying anything.
- Some people think students in primary school secondary school should be taught how to manage money because it is an important life skill Do you agree or disagree 67
- You found a job opportunity in a foreign country Write a letter to your friend who knows about the country In your letter mention the following What is the nature of your future job Why did you apply for that job Ask for details and his her advice about t 73
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions to this 73
- You missed an important meeting at work Write a letter to your manager In the letter Apologize for not going Explain why you were not there Say how you will make up for it 73
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73841059603 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52771359019 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539735099338 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4374988079 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231449626332 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850084971226 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793251843461 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166221753081 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10451007591 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.