Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticize their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticize their teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Your task

whether pupils should be allowed to evaluate and criticize the mentor or not has become a highly controversial issue all over the world in this ultra modern epoch. A section of society believes evaluation and criticization of mentor by learners is justified. However others oppose. In my perspective a teacher should never be condemned by students while evaluation is lawful in certain situations.

To begins with, where the results are not good, teachers should evaluated, as they would become alert and impart quality education. Apart from it, teachers would not be partial as they generally are towards those students who use to take tuitions or extra coaching from them. Moreover, they would be highly diligence, dedicated and devoted towards their professions and give their best. Also, according to assessment, they can change their modus operandi which further can be fruitful. To epitomize, monthly reports of students can enforce them to ameliorate the performance of each pupil.

On the flip side, teachers should not be condemned, it shows disrespect towards mentor. They feel humiliation and makes teachers unable to give their best as they always have fear of being criticized . In addition, it takes lots of diligence, devotion, and persistence efforts to get into this noble profession. Therefore, it is demotivating and discouraging for teachers if students assess them. Last but not the least, number of teaching eligibility test and interviews are conducted to hire a qualified mentor. So there are no chances to condemn their views.

To recapitulate, teachers are called nation builders. In order to give them due respect they should not be criticized but can be evaluated to improve their quality of education as well as academic performance of learners.

whether pupils should be allowed to evaluate and criticize the mentor or not has become a highly controversial issue all over the world in this ultra modern epoch. A section of society believes evaluation and criticization of mentor by learners is justified. However others oppose. In my perspective a teacher should never be condemned by students while evaluation is lawful in certain situations.

To begins with, where the results are not good, teachers should evaluated, as they would become alert and impart quality education. Apart from it, teachers would not be partial as they generally are towards those students who use to take tuitions or extra coaching from them. Moreover, they would be highly diligence, dedicated and devoted towards their professions and give their best. Also, according to assessment, they can change their modus operandi which further can be fruitful. To epitomize, monthly reports of students can enforce them to ameliorate the performance of each pupil.

On the flip side, teachers should not be condemned, it shows disrespect towards mentor. They feel humiliation and makes teachers unable to give their best as they always have fear of being criticized . In addition, it takes lots of diligence, devotion, and persistence efforts to get into this noble profession. Therefore, it is demotivating and discouraging for teachers if students assess them. Last but not the least, number of teaching eligibility test and interviews are conducted to hire a qualified mentor. So there are no chances to condemn their views.

To recapitulate, teachers are called nation builders. In order to give them due respect they should not be criticized but can be evaluated to improve their quality of education as well as academic performance of learners.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-16 Ojlw 67 view
2018-11-25 waheguru ji 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
whether pupils should be allowed to eval...
^^
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
whether pupils should be allowed to evaluate an...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty believes evaluation and criticization of mentor by learners is justified. Howe...
^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...on of mentor by learners is justified. However others oppose. In my perspective a teac...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...enerally are towards those students who use to take tuitions or extra coaching from...
^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hey always have fear of being criticized . In addition, it takes lots of diligence...
^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, it takes lots of diligence, devotion, and persistence efforts to get into thi...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of diligence, devotion, and persistence efforts to get into this noble professio...
^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll as academic performance of learners.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32269503546 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85618180022 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1848464131 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305997465679 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092986677226 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560180801645 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197916884555 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387465837093 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.