In recent days, the rate of crime has increased significantly. This problem has caused an argue and stir in society for level of punishment. One school of thought that flat plenty frames is necessary way to punish each kind of crime. While another school holds that using fixed punishment is not preferable. They believe that tribunal should penalize based on situation of each criminals. Personally, I am in argument with the former view even though the other one shows positive aspects.
The option to promulgate severe chastisement for crime is attractive for two reasons. Firstly, fixed punishment for each type of crime was dignity and fairness. Secondly it was enacted to deter violate seriously. Thus, this way can contribute to decrease the rate of crime because of the intolerance of law. For example, backing to 2011 in Viet Nam, Le Van Luyen was a nightmare for Vietnamese people since he was a teenage killer and murdered a whole of family for money. Therefore, he was fined 18 years in prison based on the fixed plenty frames for teenager without mercy.
On the other hand, a dozen of people believe that judge should be tolerant when condemn to criminal based on circumstances. Due to there are a small number of criminals who commit violations of poverty. In addition, they are aware of their misconduct and bounce off the walls to renovate well. Therefore, fixed punishment should be altered for that kind of criminals. This it also a good way to bring them back to the lives and refresh it.
I am convinced that criminals who has remorse, should be reduced their number of years in prison due to getting another chance to start new lives. In summary, despite the advantages of fixed punishments, it seems to me that each crime should be judged taking both the circumstances and motivation into account.
- Some people think they have right to use as much freshwater as they want Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource Discuss both views and give your option 76
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that circumstances of an individual crime a motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishmentDiscuss 56
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... significantly. This problem has caused an argue and stir in society for level of punish...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ssary way to punish each kind of crime. While another school holds that using fixed p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ased on circumstances. Due to there are a small number of criminals who commit violations of pove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in summary, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88064516129 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66944206075 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4813403819 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6315789474 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.9879759519 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415698859376 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110280148185 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942382794664 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228716488382 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188544857871 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.