Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need. Others however prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Charity has been considered a very noble habit since the time immemorial. Unquestionably, globalization has changed the landscape of how people contribute to community service by connecting people around the globe on social media. That is why, there has been a growing body of opinion favoring the donation to charitable institutions at national as well as international level, while others are in consummate discord with it and argue that it is better to directly contact needy people and help them. Both arguments will be analyzed before declaring a position.
On the one hand, having charitable organizations is a boon for the contemporary world as people find it easy way to contribute toward their community. Owing to the shortage of time, people would not like to put efforts to firstly find the needy people, and then contact them to support them. Further, they trust these charity organizations, believing that their hard earned money goes into right hands. To cite an example, the swelling numbers of registered charity foundations in many parts of Europe and West have provided the strong evidence of their popularity and acceptance by people. Thus, the plausibility of giving money to these mediators to help poorer ones is apparent.
On the other hand, it must be remembered that providing direct support to people in need helps to develop an emotional connection with other party, enhancing the pleasure of doing good deeds. This link would encourage people not only to help same person again in future in times of crisis, but also others who are suffering from some sort of illness. Besides, people also use this method to ensure their money is being utilized in an honest way. A statistic was recently released demonstrating that most of the communities in India have improved their well-being by directly helping needy in near community, leading to a stable country as compared to the past. Therefore, this discussion clearly shows that direct help can ensure the harmony in near community.
Following this look, even though the argument regarding importance of charitable organizations have strong support, I firmly opine that providing direct assistance to people in poor conditions is far better and optimal way to establish a connection to people of community. If people put blind faith in these organizations, they might misuse their money and would likely to create a corrupted society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-01 | balwinderbuttar01 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | balwinderbuttar01 | 84 | view |
- Negative efects of misbehaviour of celebrities 11
- Online shopping is significantly increasing What are causes and what are effects of online shopping 78
- People In The Limelight Have A Responsibility To Set An Example For Others By Their Behaviour If they behave poorly if can influence public up to what extent you are agree to this statement 56
- Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 73
- One of your colleagues recently got a new job at another company Write a letter to him her and say how you feel about him her what you enjoyed the most while working together and ask what his her plans are 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nion favoring the donation to charitable institutions at national as well as inte...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an honest way" with adverb for "honest"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to ensure their money is being utilized in an honest way. A statistic was recently released demo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, sort of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18974358974 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82517563295 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3096789733 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251272362407 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757746363393 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052791300356 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144303412564 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179420142517 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.