Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
I concede that in all levels of education, from primary to universities, the set curriculum tend to give more time of teaching theoretical facts which leaves skills that require practical extension remain unpolished. Though the importance of learning facts cannot be overlooked and without prior knowledge and research any new things remain imperceptible for a longer period of time.
In schools, students are prepared with the basics of all subject and bombarded with reading materials which bores them and eventually takes them longer time to keep in their mind. As per statistics, students now a days study for the sake of exam and cannot retain those information any longer after that certain period. The practical course will give purpose to their education. For instance, a child not knowing how he can implement algebra in his practical life most likely does not get any interest in learning mathematics. Incorporation of practical lessons regarding algebra such as showing them how algebra teaches them for time management after waking up etc. can boost student’s interest.
Then again in universities we learn a lot of new things but have zero knowledge how to implement in life when required. For example, a law students learns all the laws and articles but when it comes to use in courtroom he cannot present it well and therefore loses. That is why it is very pivotal to have practical session where students can show and practice simultaneously what they are learning.
In sum, it can be said that we learn so that we can shine in our life by implementing those. But if curriculum is not designed on how to use those learned skill then we have to let luck play their courses for students and majority students give in and eventually cannot succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hings remain imperceptible for a longer period of time In schools students are prepared with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...n their mind As per statistics students now a days study for the sake of exam and cannot r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
... for the sake of exam and cannot retain those information any longer after that certain period Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce simultaneously what they are learning In sum it can be said that we learn so t...
^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts give in and eventually cannot succeed
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89864864865 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66427923777 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 296.0 20.2975951904 1458% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1450.0 106.682146367 1359% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 296.0 20.7667163134 1425% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 87.0 7.06120827912 1232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206884259112 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206884259112 0.084324248473 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140132504826 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685922315533 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 149.6 13.0946893788 1142% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -220.5 50.2224549098 -439% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 117.5 11.3001002004 1040% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.62 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.73 8.58950901804 253% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 120.4 10.1190380762 1190% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.