Some people say that in all level of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you argree or disagree

Form past few decades, there has been remarkable change in the education policies such as all the manual imparting ways are turned into digital ones.
Despite all the advancement in technology , some people state that more emphasis is given in theoretical knowledge than practical. As far as I am concerned to this issue , I am on the same wavelength with them on this matter.

It is no exaggeration to say that students who are highly qualified still lack knowledge because they are always told to cram things since the elementary school. For instance, students hardly get their hands on computer even the subject itself is a practical subject. Thus , the consequences of becoming a book worm is that they got rejected while recruit for technical jobs.

Moreover, criteria of learning facts rather than experiencing practically makes student's knowledge obsolete. This is the reason why most of the students find study uninteresting and end up cheating in exams. If we teach students with practical approach, we can broaden the horizon of their knowledge in more comprehensive manner. With each passing day , new techniques are innovated to make learning better. Besides , more science and mathematics laboratories are installed in schools all across the world. Despite having such well furnished infrastructure, schools are generating unproductive minds and bleak students.

To recapitulate, according to above proceeding discussion , it is apparent that straight away jump from schools to colleges is not worth unless they grab basics of the knowledge. Therefore , students should be indulged in more practical and constructive ways to understand the concepts.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...espite all the advancement in technology , some people state that more emphasis is...
^^
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... As far as I am concerned to this issue , I am on the same wavelength with them o...
^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ject itself is a practical subject. Thus , the consequences of becoming a book wor...
^^
Line 6, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...prehensive manner. With each passing day , new techniques are innovated to make le...
^^
Line 6, column 401, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...chniques are innovated to make learning better. Besides , more science and mathematics...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...novated to make learning better. Besides , more science and mathematics laboratori...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oductive minds and bleak students. To recapitulate, according to above proc...
^^^
Line 10, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...according to above proceeding discussion , it is apparent that straight away jump ...
^^
Line 10, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... grab basics of the knowledge. Therefore , students should be indulged in more pra...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44787644788 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01005766898 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675675675676 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9437244217 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141612148525 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434667713873 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350976415364 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647821167779 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263431841568 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.