Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, one of the most controversial issues has been learning practical and theoretical skills in the education systems. The majority of people believe that education systems attend to the instruction of practical skills more than facts while others have another opposite idea about this. From my perspective, learning both practical and theoretical skills have their pros and cons.
On the one hand, all pupils do not want to be technically skilled because modern societies need some theoretically knowledgeable people such as university professors. Ever since I remember, in all class in all level there were some students who were interested in being a teacher or lecturer. It should be considered that learning facts is a safe way and a initial step in learning practical skills. According to Dr. Sina Fateri, who is an educationalist, “theories are the result of either research or practical experience so studying about facts improves students’ knowledge to pave the way to be technically capable.”
On the other hand, students who are interested in being talented in technical matters have to study excessive amount of documents in the best learning period of their lives; however, they do not need these theoretical concepts as much as practical skills. Statistics show that 85 percent of technicians left schools when they were adolescents to learn practical skills in a real work place. The majority of learning centers do not want to accept the responsibilities of preparing their students to be professional workers in societies; consequently, they spend their budget on paying teachers’ salaries instead of running training programs and workshops. In an article which I studied some months ago, the fact that schools can play a significant role in teaching practical skills to students was well-explained.
In conclusion, in my opinion, there are merits and demerits of learning both theoretical concepts and practical skills. Learning facts helps students to develop a scientific background so they can learn practical skills move easily than others. On the contrary, students need to learn practical skills as many as facts because it is necessary to be a professional employee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-19 | Tanweir Elahee | 56 | view |
- You received a letter from a friends asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 78
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 73
- Nowadays leisure industry products and modern gadgets are widely used by young people The use of these products reduces the young generation s creativity Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion 83
- You received a letter from a friends asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 78
- Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film starts, pop musicians and sports starts) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other type of jobs should be highly paid? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d that learning facts is a safe way and a initial step in learning practical skil...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4224137931 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16165482566 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.298322301 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.153846154 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268007805776 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115644757706 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417367337782 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178510136745 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024558657002 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.