National health improvement is of prevalent for each country. Some believe that adding sport facilities is the highest prioritized solution to enhance public health, while others think this may not be enough. A closer look at the problem will help in assessing these views.
Adding sport facilities can create some effects but not the whole. Providing the public with more sport facilities can assist residents to access to sport tools, especially those can not afford the sport facilities rent. Moreover, if there are more public sport facilities in the vicinity of habitants, civils do not have to travel any far to exercise. However, there are still some issues with providing public sport facilities. First, there are not all of residents have the habit of playing sport. For example, when I asked my friends how often they played sport, just 2 out of 10 said they did it on a regular basis. Second, as these tools are public for everyone, some people might not have any room to practice at peak hours. Therefore, just adding more tools without solving the root cause will not totally create the best effect on improving public health.
There are other several measures to approach public health improvement. First, improving health awareness and creating the habit of playing sport for every person is of important. This can be achieved by educating people from child time, helping them realize how prevalent it is to increase immune system through exercising. Second, the knowledge of nutrition and food hygiene should be propagandized more widely. If inhabitants continue to consume fast food or contaminated food everyday, their health can not be enhanced. Moreover, the government should punish restaurants and food stores more strictly if they violate food safety. Thus, the awareness of each individual of protecting and improving health is the root cause to be tapped, which needs the actions from each person to the whole community.
In conclusion, adding more sport facilities is just like giving people the tools. To make the most of these tools, we need to improve health awareness for the whole society simultaneously.
- 82
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ts to access to sport tools, especially those can not afford the sport facilities rent. M...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... consume fast food or contaminated food everyday, their health can not be enhanced. More...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14655172414 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58931326852 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1018301659 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.55 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29532971849 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967995849141 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716237559353 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182124727186 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044965063107 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.