Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults. Do you agree or disagree

In this contemporary era, most of the parents are giving their child allowances that can be use for their expenses and there are plenty of positive effect when they grow up. I firmly agree to this notion that kids would learn to value money if they get hold to it at a young age. In this essay, I will elucidate umpteen factors for aforementioned statement in following paragraphs.

To commence with, younglings are being taught by their guardians how to manage their finances. At their young age, they are already having financial allowances in a weekly basis to support their requirements in terms of school activities. For example, school projects, excursions and extra-curricular activities can give a child paramount experience, consequently, they could budget their money in a prestine way. Another reason is that they could learn to save some of their cash, if they would not use it that could also be usable when they wish to buy something they need in the near future.

In addition to this, teaching children about management of spending at a tender age, would also mean that they can understand the value of their hard earned money in the future. Moreover, they would not spend their cash on useless things, which could affect them financially or even left them out of money. As well as, learn to be self-reliant when they become adult. This will be one of the best key aspect that they could acquire which would lead them to become a successful professional not just in a career oriented but also how they manage their own life.

To recapitulate, I would reiterate that kids nowadays should be provided pocket money. In order to grasp value for money and also be able to learn how to become an independent person when they become an adult in the upcoming years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80456026059 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63100654901 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540716612378 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0999647274 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20010836525 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832134534456 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382932861027 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138530288904 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026435886854 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.