some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food discuss both views and give your own opinion

Nowadays, some people have the notion that the government should subsidize fruits and vegetables in other to make healthy foods cheap, while others are saying that unhealthy foods should be taxed.

On one hand, the government’s effort to make healthy foods cheaper is a very good development. Fruits and vegetables play a major role in the good health of an individual because of the quality of life it brings to the person. By making the prices of fruits and vegetables cheap, it is now expedient for everyone to add this class of food to their daily diets while making attempts to live and eat healthy. In addition, the fruit juice factories will also benefit and take advantage of this reduction in price once the government takes its action on the matter. If the government reduces the prices of these foodstuffs, then it will be a great achievement for the society. Health is wealth!

On the other hand, some people are saying that unhealthy foods should be taxed by the government. By this, the purchase of foods such as, sugary drinks and other unhealthy edibles will reduce drastically. In my country Nigeria, there won’t be reduction in alcohol intake until this tax comes into play. Junk foods make great contribution to obesity, yet people still want to have a bite after they have heard that it is not good health-wise. It is of essence that unhealthy foods undergo taxation, so that the people can maintain a healthy eating lifestyle which has been made cheaper by the authorities.

To conclude, my opinion regarding the discussions above is simple and direct. Subsidizing healthy foods will make it affordable for the public which in turn contributes to their well being while putting tax on unhealthy foods will help in curbing it and making it not very affordable to purchase. I have made my opinion because I feel it’s the right path to take.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de, my opinion regarding the discussions above is simple and direct. Subsidizing ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, still, then, well, while, i feel, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87774294671 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59903912494 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520376175549 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9662895863 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438413775966 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149601814352 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152416054799 0.0667982634062 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307593329523 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154873958279 0.056905535591 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.