Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It is believed by some that movies can be watched through small gadgets such as smartphones or Ipads, others critique the former opinion as they contend that watching films through a big screen of cinema would bring you a huge pleasure that is not comparable by watching movies at home. In my perspective, depending on individuals' interest both ideas can be followed.

To embark upon, let me highlight the reasons behind the preference of watching movies at home. First and foremost, people normally follow things at no charge so they can easily download all movies at no cost and watch them at home. Second and important, some people have filled up their lives with their working hours consequently they are super busy arranging a proper time to go to a cinema. To cite an example, Danny Berl who is a Canadian waiter in Toronto has said in his interview with BBC program that he usually works overtime and it is not feasible for him to join a cinema .at the same time cinema's tickets cost in Canada do not fit his budget.

Despite the tendency of some people go for movies in their own homes, certain sections of society are passionate cinema-goers who find this activity the most exciting feature to spend time on. These people think that the movie is far more understandable and exciting to watch when it is presented through a big screen with second to none sound effects. On the other hand, they believe going to cinemas not only for watching movies but also for having fun with their friends can lift their spirits up . To encapsulate the presented ideas let me illustrate a survey which is conducted by french scientists two years ago, they have claimed that going to the cinema is witnessed as the most stress-reliever pastime. In other words, this is the type of leisure that can aid you mentally and physically. This group of scientists have also added going to the cinema two times a week can thrive your both immune and stress response system.

By way of conclusion, Although some people are entirely attracted to follow movies on their tiny pieces of equipment such as mobile phones, others find going to cinema the most impressive as well as appealing doable activity to join based on presented valid facts.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Danny Berl who is a Canadian waiter in Toronto has said in his interview with B...
^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is not feasible for him to join a cinema .at the same time cinemas tickets cost in...
^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people to for movies in their own homes, certain sections of society are passiona...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... their friends can lift their spirits up . To encapsulate the presented ideas let ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76485788114 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51487233199 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552971576227 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1786179023 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.846153846 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7692307692 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197166149389 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735421841466 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352892911324 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124240929149 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336692385799 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.