The movie industry is a form of visual art comprises an epic proportion of families' leisure time in comparison to other types of entertainment. Some people believe with the advent of technologies like smartphone, there is no need to wast time in cinema tickets queues. However, others do not subscribe to the idea and contend cinema theaters are the only place you can make most of watching a box-office hit movie. To reach a clear picture of this controversial subject, I will put this matter into a comparative perspective.
On one side, mainly teenagers claim that having a small piece of technology in your pocket leaves nothing to be desired. Base on their notion it is a sheer waste of time and money to watch a movie on the big screen while it could be seen at any given time and place. My own experience contradicts this viewpoint and would be a good point in case. Two weeks ago I decided to watch a movie that I really love. Whereas I could not find enough time, I have downloaded it and begun to watch it on my phone, after ten minutes or so, my eyes started to burst in tears and I caught a bad headache, consequently, I paused the player and have never watched it again since then.
On the other side of this story, cinema fans provide evidence that watching a movie in its conventional way i.e. cinema screen, is beyond the comparison with other methods. To support this claim they point out recently conducted research about this very issue that amplifies their notion. In this article, I have read it recently, scientists investigate the correlation coefficient between the level of interaction with the movie, a pivotal factor of having fun with the film, and medium of observing it. It, without doubt, reveals that there is an unmistakable correspondent between these two factors and the big screen overtakes other media hands down.
On balance, having compared both points of view gives me the impression that the mindset favoring modern means of interaction with movies, does more harm than good because a practical view should offer more than just being time-saving. As a result, cinema is one of the best, if not the best, method of having fun watching a film; never the less eye must not be lost of the fact that it should happen along with family and friends.
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 79
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council:-describe how rubbish collection system is not working properly.- explain 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d happen along with family and friends.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, really, so, then, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68905472637 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62133940227 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594527363184 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8299379734 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173589572443 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549010572267 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457362424668 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100919138174 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247370871382 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.