We live in a fast-paced world and movies are the biggest source of entertainment for us. Whether we should watch it on electronic gadgets or in a cinema, to reach a clear picture of this controversial subject, I will put this matter into a comparative perspective.
There are certainly a few benefits to watching movies on electronic gadgets. For example, a working professional who travels to the office on public transport like a bus can watch films on his way to work. Another advantage of watching movies on a tablet is that they can save money. movie tickets are not cheap. Also, we need to factor in the cost of traveling and refreshments like popcorn and drinks. Moreover, only new movies are played in the movie hall, for instance, an Indian regional blockbuster does not get released at a Korean theater, but are available at reasonable costs on the internet.
On the other side of this story, big-budgeted movies with advanced visual and sound effects are a treat when watched with friends and family. Nevertheless, the cinema hall creates a leisurely mood with the cheering crowd and the creative art appreciated. There are also some health benefits to watching movies in a cinema. Watching them on small screens for long hours can cause eyestrain, blurred vision and pain in the neck and shoulders.
To conclude, watching movies on gadgets saves time and money, but in the long run, it is harmful to health. Also, it hurts film producers. On the other hand, different factors matter the place where a film is watched, therefore entertainment is the ultimate fun quotient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Movie
...n a tablet is that they can save money. movie tickets are not cheap. Also, we need to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90706319703 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78935288018 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602230483271 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7759762321 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106403812719 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399507384164 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323745601437 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661270292252 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00700624541364 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.