Conventional entertainment modes are now outdated by trending technologies. Significant proportion of people argue that it’s time waste to put effort and energy, when all comforts are available at the click of a button. While traditionalists believe that enjoying cinematic experience is altogether different and unparallel to regular way of watching movies at home. Vowing much respect to later statement, I reserve my opinion to former argument and in this essay after discussing both versions, I will justify by giving a conclusion.
As mentioned, due to advancement in science and internet, new methods are invented making our film experience better and easier. First of all, planning is must for visiting theatre and booking tickets, even for an average rated movie. On the other hand, reviews will not be available in cinema halls, unlike websites. From transportation to parking vehicle, the second option is not economically viable. As a result, film lovers choose mobile gadgets which serve the need irrespective of their location. Nevertheless, it is argued, few star casted and exceptional cinemas like 3-D versions are not suitable for small screens. However, films falling in this category are small and cannot be subjected to generalisation. According to recent statistics conducted by organisers of ‘Book my Show’ website more than 40% of their regular costumers are now opting for inhouse entertainment mode against film auditoriums.
Secondly, another reason for shift in their preferences is, online platforms offer various discounts and plans to new clients, a marketing technique unavailable to traditional viewers. Popular websites like Netflix, Amazon prime offer distinct and varied content apart movies making visit to theatres obsolete. Apart, their screen quality and graphics promise us better experience than that of theatres. Needless to say, that privacy, solitude is added advantages of new trend followers. With available market, experts opine that, in future movie halls will be replaced by drama or rehearsal stages, giving new hopes to drama artists. Additionally, modern gadgets are convenient to carry, thus keeping us entertained while we travel also. Re-watching content, pause options, and personalised settings in tablets gives us better control over outdoor feeling.
After lengthy discussions in above paras, to recapitulate, watching films over electronic mediums have more benefits and joyful than it’s counterpart cinema halls. Therefore I believe, in upcoming generations we can expect all houses to turn themselves into theatres bring us best entertainments to our doorsteps.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 733, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... keeping us entertained while we travel also. Re-watching content, pause options, an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ful than it’s counterpart cinema halls. Therefore I believe, in upcoming generations we c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'us the best'.
Suggestion: us the best
... to turn themselves into theatres bring us best entertainments to our doorsteps.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66414141414 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97691501522 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686868686869 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8351478875 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.80952381 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197606500454 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469928706601 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396242719932 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103510075538 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411252267175 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 78.4519038076 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.