In recent years, people inclined to think a reason for learning a foreign language only to expend free time and money on peregrinations to some areas of the world or work in there,in opposition, argued that the aim of learning it will bring many benefits to not only living and working environment but also contribute to bolstering domestic development in many fields including economy, education and healthcare. The two approaches have distinct advantages and the choice is a matter of my personal preference.
Apparently, there is no denying that people intended to work away from their own country, especially to developed countries, would bring many useful chances to meet the future prosperity. In my opinion, there are still more developing countries are facing societal afflictions embodying the increasing unemployment or meagre sustenance, domiciles to live, so it may be that the encouragement of learning overseas languages to people in indigent and disadvantaged condition to offer a chance for them to integrate in international working environment as well as give career progression in another country to turn their life into a new leaf. Besides, the employers begin to value multi-skilled capacity of employees and people who have known more than their mother tongue above concrete experiences or long-time training, that means that those who perceived very little foreign languages are more likely to be unemployed.
Nevertheless, a new language should not be learned just for travelling or working in a new environment. To my mind, a foreign language will play a ground foundation for populace to approach to modern and healthy community, especially to globally integrated trend in which external communication and contact with people from all walks of life from other parts at home and abroad are regarded as key to success,and they are depended partially on the ability of using skillfully language. From my perspective, a new language is an embodiment of ways of inventing and thinking words of ancestors as well as traditions, inherent folklore. Due to this, we could understand more something happening previously or contemporarily from another country via it. Finally, I am firmly convinced that language could discard cultural and economic barriers between countries to lead to attracting overseas investment, spreading the beauty of culture and making people become global citizens to exchange knowledge, economic growth and support each other in difficult situations.
In conclusion, I believe that the acquisition of different languages should not be only to satisfy our personal needs, such pecuniary problem, but so as to integrate and expand our minds to the world
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...some areas of the world or work in there,in opposition, argued that the aim of lear...
^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...nd abroad are regarded as key to success,and they are depended partially on the abil...
^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...onal needs, such pecuniary problem, but so as to integrate and expand our minds to the w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, finally, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39336492891 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07695011677 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.669714753 49.4020404114 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.909090909 106.682146367 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.3636363636 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22838075118 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749027137379 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705828929901 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132246201736 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575778365071 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.0946893788 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.3001002004 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.