Some people say that technologies like mobile phones are destroying social interactions To want extent do you agree or disagree

Android phones, which are generally believed to be one of the significant parts of technology, by most individuals, are considered to be destroying the social life among modern people. Although there are certain benefits associated with the usage of smartphones for social life, the disadvantages seem to outweigh the advantages in this case.

To initiate the benefits of using smartphones in terms of interacting socially with others. The first and foremost advantage is the balance of relationships with the number of people in so far places. While living in the distinct regions of the world due to some reasons like work or study, people can easily communicate with one another in a short period of time through using different social sites, whether they are friends in groups, relatives, or neighbours, which is not possible without the availability of android phones. Resultantly, people save time as well as money also whilst avoiding travelling from one place to another to meet each other. To cite an example, social sites such as Facebook, what’s an app, Twitter, and Instagram, which is commonly seen to have the highest use through smartphones, have become a major medium of social interaction around the globe.

Despite the advantages, the disadvantages of using android phones for social interaction are too. The primary one is the less capable of understanding each other among people, which might be quite higher through face to face conversation. When people prioritize to interact with others by using social media rather than face to face, they are likely to be unable to understand one another properly, especially feelings like sorrow or happiness. As a result, they may have a gap in understanding that can be the major reason for disturbance in relations. As an illustration, students and white-collar workers, who are living abroad for getting an education and earning a large sum of money, both are likely to be distracted from social life just because of the issue of lack of physical presence.

In conclusion, though perhaps managing the relations socially with one another while living in long distances is the major benefit of smartphones, it seems to be more disadvantageous owing to the lack of understanding among people.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o outweigh the advantages in this case. To initiate the benefits of using smartp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...communicate with one another in a short period of time through using different social sites, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the lack of understanding among people.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23835616438 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95543429226 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3074324319 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.076923077 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145348076644 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579857275104 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424504200012 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833674968048 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416862766046 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.