Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both views, give your opinion and include examples from your experience.
Nowadays, adverts are considered as lucrative ways to commercialize ones product in the market. It is often argued that TV commercials are positive and an effective way to promote products for sale, whilst others disagree and think that these will lead to adverse ramifications to end customers. However, I strongly accede with latter notion and in this this essay I will discuss both viewpoints with examples.
There is no doubt that TV commercials play vital role in exponential increase in any product's sale. It is a tendency of people to get attract towards products which have visual effect in their mind. Therefore, when one sees an advertisement on TV, showcasing the features of a product then It is so obvious that one wants to purchase that product, which results in immediate sale of that product.
However, I believe that this is only beneficial to big firms launching their products and not to the common man. Most of the time TV commercials mislead the people by showing only positive sides of the products. For instance, an advertisement of 'Real Fruit Juice' claims that it is made of 100% natural fruits and richness of fruits will bring health benefits to consumers. But If one looks at its ingredients then it is clear that its is made of added sugar, artificial flavors and preservatives only, which have no actual health benefit. Moreover, If any product is being promoted by ones favorite cricketer or actor then one will simply ignore the ingredients detail of the product and purchase the item blindly. Therefore, end customers are being fooled by big firms to gain profit by means of TV adverts.
To recapitulate, the benefits of TV adverts are limited to only big firms launching their products and have detrimental effects on common man. Therefore, I believe that government should take disciplinary actions against these firms so that they do not manipulate their products to gain profit while advertising.
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 84
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to such services. 61
- You are interested in attending a short course at a college in an English speaking country Write a letter to the college administration In the letter you should tell what course you would like to attend give details about your educational background and w 89
- Some people think that good teamwork makes a company successful others think that good leadership is the reason behind the success of a company Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- In some countries children under 16 years old are not allowed to leave school by law and get full time work Is this a good or bad thing Discuss your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ered as lucrative ways to commercialize ones product in the market. It is often argu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...rongly accede with latter notion and in this this essay I will discuss both viewpoints wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...tal role in exponential increase in any products sale. It is a tendency of people to get...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucts to gain profit while advertising.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80416038388 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3496268241 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920874690994 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358950527253 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199471337161 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615767367799 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00484377233275 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.