Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
Undoubtedly, every civilization predominantly and every nation specifically has an explicit sense of sporting and cultural predilection, where the members of such society or country propagate these inclinations through their diligent interest in the connected events. People spend hefty amounts on tickets in order to watch the ceremonies live, and cherish such experiences for a lifetime.
Moreover, an essential role is played by the media which covers the entire phenomenon and provides extravagant fame to these affairs. Apart from that, the people prepare themselves for such fete as long as months before their commencement. The closer the event arrives; the popular palaver about them gets stirred. In addition, they persuade others to participate in such festivals.
Not only these sporting and cultural events encourage healthy competition between the members of a society, but also evade those kinds of incidents that erode the roots of the civilization. Furthermore, these are positive trends being set for the future generations to take after. Likewise, Oktoberfest celebrated in Munich city of Bavarian Germany is an ideal paragon of such poise celebration. It stretches from sixteen to eighteen days which allures millions of people around the globe for contribution. Apparently, Oktoberfest has flourished the tourism industry of Germany to an unexpected level.
There is some truth certainly in the argument that people should not spend a lot of money on tickets especially when it comes to the event happening outside their city/ country. The prices of the hotels goes high at the same time all other things in the city gets expensive. Generally speaking, watching the live screening of any ceremony over the TV is better as one would be able to have complete coverage.
To conclude, it can safely be deduce that it is profitable and feasible to spend money for cultural and sport festivals. It not only nourishes the positive outlook but also dominate and promote the clement perception of society worldwide. However, the argument that governments should spend money on sporting and cultural events and instead watch the event on TV is not easy to justify.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-04 | inayatraza@gmail.com | 22 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 89 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 36 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | MariaOvais | 78 | view |
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 36
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 84
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? 78
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 84
- Some people argue that governments should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs, and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...g of any ceremony over the TV is better as one would be able to have complete cove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35755813953 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85080467183 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8850467895 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202570755967 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517424948307 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628074959936 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104073297846 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616370545711 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.