For a successful business, many an individual like to pursue their professional life in their own family businesses due to swallow a large chunk of benefits; however, there are some dweller who oppose this notion and believe that it has disadvantages. This essay shall first demonstrate that there are more awareness about the nature and potential of working masses, which is a biggest merit of this statement, followed by an analysis of the primary demerit, namely adverse affect on the relationships, is not a valid.
To commence, while considering the imperative benefits of continuing work in own businesses, first and foremost is that there is understanding amongst the team and the employer. To explicate, if a person is working in their own family then there are lack of misunderstanding related to their work and their personality. In this way, the head of the business could easily track the way of others working style, their potential towards work and especially there is better communication, so it is not only benefits for the entire business’s productivity, but also a constructive point for the less conflicts among the team members. Mukesh Ambani owner of Reliance Industries, for instance, is one of the billionaires businessman in India and run a business which was first started by his father, Dhirubhai Ambani, in Mumbai and till now it is well managed, and also his wife and son are pursuing their career in the same business.
Despite its better awareness about the employees, there are certain drawbacks of the aforesaid notion. Primarily, the utmost destructive effect is on the relationships of people who are indulged in one business. To elaborate, in order to effectively manage the working criteria and to esclate the business at peak, it is crucial to go through every single aspect of the business in terms of everything is well maintained and all the workers are working accurately or not. Sometimes it is raised an issue which leads to the conflicts among the members of family and cast a profound impact on their personal life and harms their last-long relationships. Moreover, it is harculean task to fire an employee in case the work is not correct. Therefore, in such circumstances, the chances of excellent job seeks are declined due to favourism for their own family members as well as it effected the overall revenue of the company.
To compendium, having pondered-over a great deal of thoughts and deliberation, it could be encapsulated that the positive side of this working way is better understanding in all the workers at the workplace, and its negative side could not be overlooked that is harmful for their both personal and professional life who involved in the same business.
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- in today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers what can arts tell us about life that science and technology can not 11
- Some people believe that technology has made a man more sociable and others think that it has made us less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- More people than ever before travel to other countries than ever before Why this has happened Is this a positive development or negative 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'dwellers'?
Suggestion: dwellers
...nk of benefits; however, there are some dweller who oppose this notion and believe that...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...d potential of working masses, which is a biggest merit of this statement, follo...
^
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...masses, which is a biggest merit of this statement, followed by an analysis of th...
^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... of the primary demerit, namely adverse affect on the relationships, is not a valid. To ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...rse affect on the relationships, is not a valid. To commence, while considering the im...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...esses, first and foremost is that there is understanding amongst the team and the employer. To ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that there is understanding amongst the team and the employer. To explicate, if ...
^^
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conflicts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., but also a constructive point for the less conflicts among the team members. Mukes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lace, and its negative side could not be overlooked that is harmful for their bot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06888888889 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03015380777 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.414059519 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.461538462 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6153846154 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140383020219 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462065581448 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408696393289 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080735489841 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407813341531 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.