Some people think the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles.
To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
It is indeed true that currently, global warming is the biggest threat mankind is facing. Some people believe that by increasing the price of fuel the environmental problem can be resolved. However, I differ from them and would like to point out the supporting ideas in the following paragraphs.
The first and foremost reason for not supporting the statement is there are lots of factors causing damage to the environment other than vehicles. In other words, the contribution of emission of fossil fuel from the vehicle has just a fraction of share in degrading the environment quality. Other factors such as burning gas in industries for mass production contaminates air quality, which is causing air pollution. Releasing industrial hazards in the river also creates water pollution and endangered marine life. Mixture of dust in air because of large real estate projects also degrade air quality which creates a plethora of health disease related to people’s respiratory system.
Another reason influences me to not agreeing with the statement is vehicle are the necessity of today’s fast-paced life. Vehicle plays a major role in the transportation of people and goods. Increase in fuel price will negatively affect poor people’s lives, as it will also increase the cost of transportation. In addition to that basic grocery and food item becomes costly which deprives lots of poor people of meeting basic life necessity. For instance, produces generally transported from farm to the market by vehicle. If fuel cost increases, it will also increase vegetables prices which negatively affect farmer’s earning as selling of vegetables might be decreased.
To conclude, It is most important for the human race to solve the environmental issue. But to increase fuel price for cars and other vehicle is not the solution. Othe measures should be take to save the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-12 | sbparmar14 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to people's respiratory system. Another reason influences me to not agre...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lling of vegetables might be decreased. To conclude, It is most important for th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taken'?
Suggestion: taken
...t the solution. Othe measures should be take to save the environment.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33554817276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9539984387 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574750830565 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3296172611 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237513726516 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746503176287 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731961753292 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146130314506 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507822953168 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.