Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that in case of particular types of crime and criminals, unpaid social work is more preferable than putting people into jails. I agree to the above-mentioned statement, however I think there are some serious crimes, which should be punished for in a tougher way.
There are many advantages of community jobs in comparison with jails. First of all, a too severe punishment may cause a feeling of injustice for the individual, who has breached a law. For example, a teenager, who has stolen bread from a supermarket and, therefore, was sentenced to imprisonment, can get disappointed with the justice system and may in future commit even worse crimes. Secondly, there is for sure more use of people if they work for the common benefit, rather than if they spend a few months in jail. And last, but not least, this way the criminal will not feel himself/herself isolated from the society. Many dangerous crimes are commited on anti-social grounds, creating a gap among different layers of the society.
However, as I have already stated, this approach only applies to some insignificant law breaches. In case of majour crimes, such as murders, rapes, hijacks and so on, the guilty ones must be isolated. One of the reasons is that they are simply dangerous for other members of the community. In other words, they can do harm shall they be given freedom. Another reason is that the stricted their punishment is, the more likely it is that others will at least be afraid to follow their examples. From my own observations I can tell that where high moral standards don’t work, the fear of potential punishment may hold people back from the wrong path in life.
To conclude, I strongly believe that there can be certain circumstances, when free community work is more beneficial than imprisonment. At the same time, this cannot be the case for dangerous and fatal crimes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | prabhpreet kaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prabhpreet kaur | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | b.yousefi | 84 | view |
- With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?How can this be solved? 89
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times even on holidays Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 67
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads Do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for example, i think, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90031152648 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7671689185 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6333323589 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170655345759 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052762276624 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052224733737 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122079289804 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642842731686 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.