Some People think that developments involving the internet have brought people together while other think that people and communities have become more isolated?
A very visible difference of opinion has been marked amongst the commentators opinion about the role of advancement in information technology and its social influence. Some individuals in this regard are having a very optimistic view that cyberspace is connecting us globally regardless of boundaries. Opponent, however have a different narrative as they believe individuals are cutting-off from social circles. The upcoming paragraphs proffers an insight into the both doctrines with the pragmatic emphasis that internet is making our lives disconnected from real world.
Not endorsed by everyone, albeit, still attested by some individuals that; internet is connecting us with the people sitting miles away. This belief is normally quoted with a perception that we are staying close to family members living overseas. According to them world shrank and they can connect with the world in no time, which was not possible because of cyberspace. We have found the advocates of this belief mainly amongst the individuals.
Contrarily, the idea of cyberspace is unbiasedly not supported by many individuals ranging from intellectual to the common men. The fundamental argument against cyberspace is it is making societies friendless. Individuals and societies everyone is becoming victim of social isolation, which is a state in which there is lack of connection between individuals. Hence development such as cyberspace is accountable for loneliness.
Another striking yield of cyberspace is it is taking individuals away from physical exertion. Individuals spend most of the time over the internet and not paying attention towards outdoor activities such as playing games or gym. Which is affecting individual's health in a negative manner.
Conclusively, thought polarization about the cyberspace cannot be simple settled with heavy arguments on both sides. But what has emerged as more rational after analysis both views, the stance of internet affecting physical connections sounds more reasonable and appropriate. It is, however, individuals job to use internet according to necessity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'commentators'' or 'commentator's'?
Suggestion: commentators'; commentator's
... of opinion has been marked amongst the commentators opinion about the role of advancement i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'proffer'.
Suggestion: proffer
...social circles. The upcoming paragraphs proffers an insight into the both doctrines with...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lack of connection between individuals. Hence development such as cyberspace is accou...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ctivities such as playing games or gym. Which is affecting individuals health in a ne...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...laying games or gym. Which is affecting individuals health in a negative manner. Conclusiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative manner" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Which is affecting individuals health in a negative manner. Conclusively, thought polarization ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66878980892 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07890473172 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608280254777 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1370144762 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104721011702 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307664660257 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373458651002 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527669817494 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280818129763 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.