Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Environmental problems are increasing at a rapid pace. While some believe it's better to deal with them globally others feel it require action from respective countries. So, which route is more efficient than the other? This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and provide evidence as to why both ideas need to complement each other in the fight for the environment.
Any action taken at a global level will provide more benefits. Especially, Considering the fact that most environmental problems irrespective of their country of origin have devastating ripple effects all across the globe. For example, leaders at United Nations Organizations took it upon themselves to deal with the problems of deforestation occurring due to development all around the world. They created a mandate for maintaining at least 40% forest cover and penalized every country in violation of the law. Indeed, such favourable laws which have a global jurisdiction prove fruitful for the environment.
Conversely, any action taken at a global level requires equal enthusiasm and participation from respective countries as well. Every country needs to promote environment friendly practices and focus on solving environmental issues of their own. If countries do not participate then no global law or action will have any effect. For example, despite of following the 40 percent rule, pollution in India and China was among the highest in the world till the year 2018. Recently, to reduce the pollution and improve living conditions, these countries have made significant effort to increase the forest cover from 40 to 60 percent thus alleviating the problem. Such responsible acts can create a major difference and can only be achieved at a national level.
This essay discussed the efficacy of responsible actions taken at a global level as well as importance of efforts put forth by nation when dealing with environmental issues. In my opinion, both global bodies and individual nations need to work in harmony as these problems are increasingly affecting everyone living on this planet.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-29 | Bilal-88 | 84 | view |
2019-07-28 | D87eepak | 84 | view |
2019-07-18 | JimmyMcgill | 61 | view |
2019-05-05 | aratanpal | 89 | view |
2019-04-24 | ahsan.ca707 | 56 | view |
- In many developing countries, there is a problem with a declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this? 73
- In many developing countries, there is a problem with a declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this? 73
- "Prevention is better than cure". Researching and treating is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures.To what extent do you agree 89
- In many developing countries, there is a problem with a declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this? 84
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...roblems are increasing at a rapid pace. While some believe its better to deal with th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, at least, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29819277108 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91550550956 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605421686747 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.602288874 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224752042776 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717397855878 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071317234753 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159684715901 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104102890255 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.