Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
According to some people, environmental issues are macroscopic and is of little concern to individuals. Others, on the contrary, maintain that these issues could only be addressed if individuals take actions. In my point of view, I agree with the latter, which means humans could sonly solve environmental problems by taking measures on a microscopic level.
On the one hand, environmental issues such as oil shortage, desertification, marine pollution are big problems and strongly require governments’ efforts such as implementing laws and countries cooperating together, however, these large-scale measures could come into force more effectively only if the citizens or individuals devote efforts too. It would be pointless for governments to enact laws without the citizens obeying the laws and cultivating an eco-friendly living style. For example, governments and countries could establish rules to limit the increasing activities of fishing industry and prohibit excessive petrol discharges of vessels, while individuals could curb pollution by not littering in bathing beaches. There is a saying 'Many a little makes a mickle', the more uncivilized people throwing garbage into a sea, the more non-biodegradable waste being generated, hence the more marine creatures like turtles choking to death.
On the other hand, environmental problems stem from individual misbehaviours that should be eradicated. Rome is not built in one day, so does ecological crisis, which is caused by accumulated damage done to the Earth by humans. Some major environmental deterioration such as water shortage, global warming, air pollution, and so on are brought about by individuals, residents and citizens in a microscopic level. For instance, the root causes of water shortage and global warming are waste of domestic water during showers, and carbon emissions of each overly used private vehicles, respectively. By reducing each household's amount of time for taking showers and the frequency of taking private transport, the accumulated effects would be extremely positive and beneficial for conservation resources, mediating global temperature rise and saving the Mother Earth.
In conclusion, no one could be exempt from being responsible for the nowadays degradation of the environment. It is not only the nations' but also everyone's business in regards to protecting the environment. As long as more individuals make a contribution to the Planet Earth, big problems could be minimized to trivial problems and even no problem.
- Nowadays more and more jobs and tasks which involve hard physical work are done by machines Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 89
- Some people claim that newspaper is the best way to get the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 89
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aking measures on a microscopic level. On the one hand, environmental issues su...
^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...the nations but also everyones business in regards to protecting the environment. As long as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63612565445 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20655410911 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578534031414 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7373604818 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.533333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268082317124 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887829495975 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693547077207 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170970563865 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461040157776 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.