It is often argued that doing homeworks makes pupils more successful and helps them to get higher marks, or in contrast, has not good impact on them and is not useful at all. I believe that in most cases, giving homework to schoolchildren is beneficial for them.
Firstly, I think that all students tend to be playful, and waste their time regardless what they are expected to do. That is to say, if pupils do not have any work to do, they will be captivated by some amusing activities like playing computer games that has not any advantageous results. In fact homeworks force them to be engaged with their courses between two sessions and then do not forget taught materials totally. In my view, students who have some work to do after school, learn to use their time subconciously.
Moreover, students need to review their lessons individually to find out their weaknesses. This may not only results in better learning, but also helps schoolchildren to promote their self-confidence. In other words, doing homeworks prepares young people to face with exam's problems irrespective of everything else.
Finally, despite many claims and assumptions about negative aspects of giving homework to students, I have never seen any proven connection between undoing homeworks and getting good grades.
Taking everything into consideration, I would say that doing homeworks has a great influence on pupil's success. Without homeworks students tend to gravitate towards computer games and so on. Also, in absence of homeworks they might remain behind others who have some work to do at home.
Some persons regard kicking
Some persons regard kicking untamed animals or birds out of the city as true, whereas, others believe in opposite attitude towards these creatures. It is clear that keeping them in the city is not a viable idea. Firstly, this essay will discuss the importance of taking wild animals and birds back to their wildlife habitat and secondly, the essay will look at the effects of keeping them in the city.
There is a growing body of evidence that emphasizes the significance of virgin territories for savage animals and birds. As most of environmentalists always alert community about vulnerabilities of wildlife, we are supposed to respect them and do not keep these creatures apart from where they are belong to. The New York Times reported in march 2016 that 32% of animals that have lost their habitats because of human's ambitions to develop roads and bridges, and come toward cities between 2013 to 2015, passed away, whereas 20% of the rest injured severely.
Some people like to keep wild creatures in the city and think being under full-watch supervision of municipality’s agents, they are safe and secure, whereas, not only taking care of them is hardly possible but also their instinctive behaviours might be dangerous, even fatal for citizens. For example, recently, Ali Mikaeli the reporter of VIP, announce that a family who keep some untamed snakes in their house, found the youngest child unconscious and poisoned at the doorway.
In conclusion, it is much more better to force beast animals and birds return to their habitat because staying in the city not only is a bad option for them but also may endanger people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...oing homeworks has a great influence on pupils success. Without homeworks students ten...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, i think, in contrast, in fact, in most cases, in my view, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12692307692 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80376701376 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6995557839 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262244335846 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931216589628 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495280175831 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148641068074 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359823840732 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.