Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Some part of the populous believes that countries and their administration are not vigilant with their spending when it comes to the humanities sector. They are of the opinion that this budget could be constructively used for other parts of society. I partly disagree with this school of thought.
On one hand, Arts are an integral part of any region's culture. It should be safeguarded and celebrated. Many governments by themselves and in collaboration are striving to preserve the fine arts of their ancestors. For instance, the United Nations has set up UNESCO sites to preserve world history and heritage. Protecting and preserving the nation's past is one of the prime objectives of the ruling class of any country. Additionally, more funds are required to promote and encourage the development of fine arts as it boosts the nation’s creativity and intellect.
Humanities, be it performing arts or otherwise boost the talent and creativity of the county's inhabitants. The culture and its influence on the population is an undeniable fact. It is the differences in traditions and culture that create and inspire artists all around the world. Thus, pumping money into the arts is a long-term investment for a nation and one that must not be taken lightly for instant gratification.
On the other hand, developing countries adhere to a very strict budget as they aspire to be self-sustaining. This could hinder the funds set aside for arts and humanities.
In conclusion, the proportion of money spent on the arts and culture of a country probably depends on the state of the county's economy and standing in the global environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
Some part of the populous believes that countries and their administration...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humanities'' or 'humanity's'?
Suggestion: humanities'; humanity's
...ith their spending when it comes to the humanities sector. They are of the opinion that th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05860539396 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4297258205 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20021408763 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616555800498 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052328273502 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10995348749 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327425400066 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.