It is said that there are many public institutions which should be invested by administration than spending money on the arts. However there are two view points on this score and I try to explain them in my essay.
There are many reasons why art should be funded by government. Firstly, art brings a lot of benefits to society including educational capital, cultural heritage and influence in better way on other public institutions. Supporting of art allows to evolve intellectual components of society. For instance, art affect the educational assets that can expend imagination and visual literacy in children due to this critical thinking, communication and innovations skills are developed, which are key aspects in 21st century. Also, encouragement of arts by grants enables to protect cultural legacies that makes culture of country unique and allows to safe traditions along to future generations.
But from the other side there are more important public institutions which should be invested by government such as healthcare, market and justice system. It is considered that arts don’t bring an advantage to society and many people do not want to pay taxes in this field because this is not an appropriate. Furthermore, art is deemed should be funded by private organizations not government. For instance, at the same time there are many controversial art installations which are impenetrable and unnecessary to society but many investors who are able to value it, can capitalize their investment.
Overall, this issue is very complicated and debatable but I suggest if government does not fund art, than cultural educational level in public will decrease.
- many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 56
- The following appeared in a report presented for discussion at a meeting of the directors of a company that manufactures parts for heavy machinery:“The falling revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing. These delays 79
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this view point? 73
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend and propose solutions you think would be effective 73
- The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life:“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunitiesor a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ration than spending money on the arts. However there are two view points on this score...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'evolving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: evolving
... institutions. Supporting of art allows to evolve intellectual components of society. For...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is considered that arts don't bring an advantage to society and many people ...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...taxes in this field because this is not an appropriate. Furthermore, art is deemed should be f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32452830189 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08559740672 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0758558965 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188854085769 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682820610174 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369176973837 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116986076603 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190980311123 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.