Over the past two or three decades, the way of living is changed due to which there is an increase in demand. But, some people thought the ruling party should increase the prizes for fuel in order to solve the environmental issues. I completely disagree with the above statement, I will try to give some examples in order to solve the environmental problems.
Increasing fuel prices cannot be an effective solution to handle global warming. To commence with, the affluent has no influence on this step as they can spend their money on anything. In other words, the wealthy people of the globe have extra money and this surplus amount they will spend on petrol, if governments increase the amount of fuel. To cite an example, in South Arabia, the local government costs more money for fuels, but the local, as well as rich people, still ride their cars on roads as they do not have any effects by the hike. Therefore, a price hike is not effective and it only affects the middle-class population.
Furthermore, the government can co-operate with the researchers and they can invent cars and other vehicles, that do not need fossil fuel. Simply put, the world has many sustainable resources namely, solar energy, wind energy, hence the researchers can develop a vehicle that runs on solar power instead of petrol, which helps to overcome the environmental problems. For instance, a few years ago, one has made a solar car which does not require petrol or diesel, thus governments should make more pieces of this types of cars and other vehicles, not only to save the environment, but also to stop humans unnatural deaths.
To conclude, the alternative option of fossil fuels can curtail the air pollution and other issues related to climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... governments should make more pieces of this types of cars and other vehicles, not o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89261744966 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59161228076 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.10890279 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31014942453 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103191656061 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089178201308 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165422876105 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832308480007 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.