Some People Think That For Individuals Planning For The Future Is A Waste Of Time It Is More Important For Individuals To Focus On The Present Do You Agree Or Disagree

Essay topics:

Some People Think That For Individuals, Planning For The Future Is A Waste Of Time. It Is More Important For Individuals To Focus On The Present. Do You Agree Or Disagree?

In the current age, prioritizing present goals over future has sparked much discussion. Some people assert that, planning for futue is waste of time and indiviuals should focus on present tasks. I personally, do not agree. In my opinion, future planning is as vital as present.

Planning for future is extemely essential, as it encourages fresh graduates and young working adults to set goals in life. As a result, they take steps to achieve those milestones and stay motivated to keep moving ahead in life with an positive attitude. This not only benefits indiviuals but also the society. Readon being, internally driven indiviuals contribute to the enconomy and help in forming a better society. Moreover, planning for future helps in reinforcing the quality of saving money and maintaing good realtions with members of the community.

Similarly, actions and efforts put in today will help in achieving future objectives. For instance, the dream to become a manager after 5 years, for that one needs to showcase his talent and expertise at work on day to day basis. This will help him to focus on present as well as gradually move towards the long term targets. Secondly, only focusing on present can turn indivials cold towards each other in the society. In addition, lack of future planning can led to bad debts, which will be a burden on the countries economy. Therefore, only focusing on present is not a correct suggestion.

To summarize, focusing on tomorrow is equally important as today, because the the goals of tomorrow will drive the actions and efforts of today.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-24 BHAUMIK 56 view
Essays by user karankhanolkar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...vated to keep moving ahead in life with an positive attitude. This not only benefi...
^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a better society. Moreover, planning for future helps in reinforcing the qual...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ad debts, which will be a burden on the countries economy. Therefore, only focusing on pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... is equally important as today, because the the goals of tomorrow will drive the action...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... is equally important as today, because the the goals of tomorrow will drive the action...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03041825095 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65646436133 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5540026487 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6875 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305033157863 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906352107383 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898039938947 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177188970618 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110381219195 0.056905535591 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.