Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however, others think there are some other ways.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, there are many movement on traffic to protect the enviroment. Some believes that international motocar-free days are useful to reduce polluted air whilst some people think that there are more better ways. I agree up to a point but there are also other ways to reduce air pollution and this essay will discuss both of view and give my opinion.
On the one hand, free car days are made and there are many positive effects. The day say no to cars is more common day by day and forms a large crowding effect on emissions reduction, there are more believes that international car-free days help protect the enviroment, even people use bike instead of car or motorbike. As a case on this point, international-car free days are interested by young people, there are more volunteering activities to enjoy this day and help Earth avoid the global warming. It can say international car-free days make people be more conscious and protect our enviroment.
On the other hand, some people say there are other better ways to reduce air pollution. International car-free days are only effective in the first years, after will fail. To have a long-term project, governments must set a detail plan. Some people suggest the ways to protect the enviroment are use public transports, reduce plastics, use renewable energy, ect. People believe that these ways are more realistic, cheaper and easier. It will be more variety ways to protect our air and interntional-car free days are only a short-term project, people should set up a long-term plan.
Conlusively, international car-free days are fit way to deal air problems but there are more better ways to reduce pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 70
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 82
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 31
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...whilst some people think that there are more better ways. I agree up to a point but there a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
... better ways. I agree up to a point but there are also other ways to reduce air pollution and this e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'emissions'' or 'emission's'?
Suggestion: emissions'; emission's
...ay and forms a large crowding effect on emissions reduction, there are more believes that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... way to deal air problems but there are more better ways to reduce pollution.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97849462366 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82936716139 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7477890655 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462213144426 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17129396422 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117165241187 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31872535759 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108647785779 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.