Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Although the relocation of large companies and industries to regional areas outside large urban centers is thought to be beneficial for the companies, other people think that there are potential problems with this plan. In my opinion, the relocation can help the companies plan their production on a large scale and the advantages associated with it have an upper hand over the disadvantages.

Admittedly, the relocation of large industries to regional areas can have various positive effects on the company as well on the communities in the regional area. Firstly, the industries would not be impeded by the limited space availability in urban centers. The companies can construct their production centers on a large scale, thereby increasing their profits. Secondly, the industries would have copious workforce. There are a lot of people in regional areas who are unemployed. The industrialization would also abate unemployment. Thirdly, various industries rely on raw materials, which are abundant in regional areas. This would be immensely useful for the industries, which previously had to get the raw materials by expensive modes of transportation.

Nevertheless, despite of various advantages, the relocation could be detrimental as well. There are many regional areas, which have strict laws and regulations in order to maintain their pristine condition. In this case, the industries releasing harmful emissions could face lawsuits. Furthermore, the supply and distribution of products after the post-production phase could be significantly expensive.

In conclusion, the industries should be well informed about all the upsides and downsides of this plan in order to make a wise decision. In my opinion, the industries would have a lot more opportunities to excel if they decide to relocate to regional areas.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (7 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55913978495 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20378785591 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530465949821 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8292140016 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336024596833 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10772440419 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930549966513 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196478108374 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121919151809 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.