Some people think that large international sport evants only brings drawbacks, and that is not worth hosting them.Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that large international sport evants only brings drawbacks, and that is not worth hosting them.

Do you agree or disagree

It is true that hosting a global sport event is harder to any nation since it will bring certain pressure in finance. But I belived there are many positive impacts as well. I will talk about both of those views in here.

First of all as for many people it will lead to a many economical downsides if it's not organize propally since all the buildings , sport grounds and all other decorations take money. Not only that but also it lead to may governmental corruptions as well. On the other hand if we cannot fullfit all those spend at end of the day there is no purpose of doing so. In addition to all those buildings that built should also have some future reference to country sport or at least some other valuable purpose like music events.

But in my point of view if we manage to get a profit out of it, it is worth to do. Also hosting a big event will bring all the world attention and it will lead a good revamped to country tourisum industry in future. Also hosting a big event make many job opportunaties and reduce unemployment for time being. On top of, it will bring new businesses and investors in to the country and leads to open companies and various jobs as well. In adition country and government can get long term benefits from it.

In conclusion, even though there are some downsides of hosting a global sport event there are many positive impacts as well. So it is worth to try and do so.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-24 thulasya 56 view
Essays by user thulasya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rganize propally since all the buildings , sport grounds and all other decorations...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...s take money. Not only that but also it lead to may governmental corruptions as well...
^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... a profit out of it, it is worth to do. Also hosting a big event will bring all the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lead a good revamped to country tourisum industry in future. Also hosting a big e...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... revamped to country tourisum industry in future. Also hosting a big event make many job...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...o country tourisum industry in future. Also hosting a big event make many job oppor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...n future. Also hosting a big event make many job opportunaties and reduce unemployment f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...tive impacts as well. So it is worth to try and do so.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, as for, at least, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39163498099 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36581763667 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528517110266 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0623929177 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150986010441 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531435433707 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382696835713 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101625665594 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333477716246 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.