Some people think that machines have decreased the work load of people.Others, however, believe that these have more negative effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that machines have decreased the work load of people.Others, however, believe that these have more negative effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although it is sometimes thought that machines play a significant role in easing lives of many workers, other people believe that these artificial brains have more of the detrimental effects.However, I consider that machines help masses do work efficiently.

On the one hand, some people think that machines have improved the quality of lives and i agree. In other words, one can do their work efficiently without worrying about errors and time whereas before the advancements in technology, when there were no machines, people rarely had choices for their own. It was hardly possible to think for oneself as everyone would be engaged in their work. For instance, its very simple to calculate millions with a single click on calculators without any mistake in it, consequently, saving time for other leisure activities. In addition, many machines like the Magnetic Resonance Imaging machines and X-ray machines aid in visualizing the interior of the body and prevent spread of many dreadful diseases like cancers by diagnosing them at very early stage. Furthermore, the machines have decreased the workers required for completing the task as they are potential in carrying the work without tiring.

On the other hand, it is often believed that machines have deteriorated the lives of people especially in relation to health. Put simply, the sedentary lifestyle of the masses these days, which have been adopted with the advancements in technology, have led to many diseases. People are no more fit as they hardly have any hard work to burn the excessive fat in them. As a result, the majority of population is becoming obese and lethargic,consequently, affecting the health negatively. Another reason why people oppose machines is that these equipments need the substantial amounts of non-renewable resources, for their working, which after burning relase the harmful gases like carbon-monoxide and ultimately causing the environmental pollution: a biggest isssue on the globe.

In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that machines act as a sword arm in completing the laborious tasks more efficiently. The meticulous use of them is a key to happy life.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-12 Ramandeep Dhillon 78 view
Essays by user Ramandeep Dhillon :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ns have more of the detrimental effects.However, I consider that machines help masses d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... have improved the quality of lives and i agree. In other words, one can do their...
^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iently without worrying about errors and time whereas before the advancements in ...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technology, when there were no machines, people rarely had choices for their own....
^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consequently
...pulation is becoming obese and lethargic,consequently, affecting the health negatively. Anoth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ly causing the environmental pollution: a biggest isssue on the globe. In conc...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28735632184 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04928252652 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566091954023 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.309216399 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279036497091 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997609797757 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801811471349 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176583729214 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601053884164 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.