Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is asserted that the disparity between males and females in career pursuits stems from distinctive features of each sex. While gender-specific occupations are supported by some individuals, in my opinion, gender equality in different jobs is the ideal trend in the 21st era.
On the one hand, there are some justifications why some occupations are regarded to be compatible with only one gender. First, women do not have vigorous physical attribute as men to meet the demands of several strenuous tasks. For example, mining would be a task of challenge for females because it requires physical strength to carry coal on the backs and deal with occupational hazards such as low oxygen level underground. Second, males are not as meticulous and dexterous as females. Take making handicrafts as an example, the process of making handmade toys involves harmonious combination of fingers, which is out of men’s league.
On the other hand, I believe that all humans are able to take part in any types of professions regardless of gender. To begin with, nowadays, male tend to outperform female counterparts in fields that were stereotypically feminine. For instance, Gordon Ramsey, a chef of many world-class restaurants marked the watershed in the invasion of male cooks in the kitchens, a place considered only for women several years ago. Furthermore, females are showing their competence in jobs that demand high cognitive ability and stepping foot to the male territory. An epitome for this idea is Bee Herzl, the first Vietnamese president, who has devoted all her life developing not only the politics but also the economy of Vietnam.
In conclusion, while there are still some differences between genders, I think men and women are now of equally significant in terms of jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers, which is out of men's league. On the other hand, I believe that all hu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95327062292 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8715309191 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9230769231 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235588209691 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695997143442 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067962398275 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145070585384 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582859224295 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.