In the contemporary world, most of the working organization environments are not based on gender. A certain set of people believes that due to specific skillsets of men and women these practices should not follow. In this essay, it will be discussed that why such thinking based scenarios are absolutely preposterous.
To embark on, from antiquity there are several examples regarding how women have proved themselves equivalent to men. For instance, Queen Victoria, Madam Curi and so on marked their presence in the fields which were under the high influence of male dominating society. Certainly, such females are still unique resemblance of women empowerment for generations. However, some features like physical and psychological differences are inevitable, yet these do not forbid or deter them to show interests in any field.
On the contrary, no such skill is out there in the world which could not be mastered with patience and diligence. There are more eminent male chefs, teachers and fashion designers around the globe then women, similarly, on the other side of the spectrum, we have numbers of mathematicians, scientists and astronauts from another gender than male. Such demographics apparently depicts that ideas which advocate in favor of works should be distributed as per the sex of human seems absurd.
In conclusion, people have their opinion that jobs should be distributed according to the gender of a person, due to their specific skills based on gender. Although there are some differences in physical and psychological perspectives, however, any skill can be learned with diligence and patience. This essay discussed these points and elaborated why jobs should never be distributed on the basis of the sex of an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ostly jobs and women are still standing little bit behind. If we see the in other develo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n are still standing little bit behind. If we see the in other developed countries...
^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that interest makes the person better. If he/she is having good quality in any ar...
^^
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ould not go for that uninterested work. According to me, there is no difference between women a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'gaint the highest'.
Suggestion: gaint the highest
... Even we have some legends, those women gaint highest profile in much big organization. Like ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
.... There are 75 percent women are placed in highest post
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81603773585 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42573477801 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7732246014 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.7222222222 106.682146367 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7777777778 20.7667163134 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24384323212 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741910389729 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058454896776 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145072561071 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566490231427 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.0946893788 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 50.2224549098 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.