Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think that it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The use of technology is increasing rapidly in this modern world. Growing technology advancement make people social bees as due to social networking sites, the extended network of people and communities are widening which gave raise to global business as well where as on the other hand, same technology also increases gap within immediate family because people have less time to communicate and to create family bonding which means that spending time with new gadgets and networking make people isolated. This essay will discuss both approach, followed by opinion.
Firstly, people powered by technology such as smartphones, ipad and smart watches make them feasible to connect with entire world in real time. In addition, they can not only chat but can also exchange knowledge. This concept has been advantageous for international business and simultaneously generating income and improving quality of life. According to research paper published in Spider, world renowned magazine for networking and technology conveys that 50% of global trade is increased due to exposure of technology. One of such great example is Ali express which gain its popularity in last 2 years and connected millions of traders at a single platform. Thus, it is clear that technology make people sociable as a result global business also increased.
On contrary, family relations are strengthened by bonding and love but nowadays youngsters are connected with online friends and they explore their comfort zone in this virtual world consequently, they end up being isolated and increased mental stress and anxiety. As per the statistics of National behavioural Disorder Association of Pakistan published in 2017 states that 8 out of 10 children are struggling with behaviour disorder like disrespect with elders, snatching & stubborn attitude due to exposure to technology. The argument that technology is keeping people isolated can not be debunked.
To conclude, technology brings people and communities together, which also benefit the global business. However, it is also identified that it brought communication gap within family and as a result, young generation are facing behavioral disorder. In my opinion, use of technology must be enhanced to improve quality of life where as problems associated with this can be minimised with effective counseling among children.
- Local people do not go very often to museums or historic sites Why is that so What can be done to change the situation 89
- Some psychologists say that doing absolutely nothing for a period of time each day is the key to decreasing stress in everyday life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Too much money is wasted on exploring the oceans. This money would be better spent elsewhere. Discuss both sides. 73
- Some people think that the media newspaper have the right to publish details of people s private life while others think it should be controlled Discuss both views give your opinion 47
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products Do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...h gave raise to global business as well where as on the other hand, same technology also...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result global business also increased. On contrary, family relations are streng...
^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... be enhanced to improve quality of life where as problems associated with this can be mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h effective counseling among children.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51515151515 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89394096976 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.4277167956 49.4020404114 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183240761978 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637527324801 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667486333891 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113753600001 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077699180887 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.