21st century is dedicated to technology, most of the advancement and innovations in technology belongs to this century. It has created a huge impact on the lives of people. Altering the economical balance of the classes, some thinks it as a positive change whereas other think just opposite of it. In this essay I m going to discuss pros and cons of technology on the society with my objectivity.
To begin with, technology is not confined to one class, it has broken the social barrier, eveyone has equal rights over it. Smartphone is used by rich and poor, even the high end model of them is available to the richest businessman and same model is used by a college graduate. It has a huge positive impact, first and foremost, helped in empowering the poor, those people living in remote areas who do not have access to the newspaper, magazines etc due to technological advancement can communicate from their home to any part of the world. It helped them not only in their daily lives but also open new options of trade and business. Secondly, revolutionised the field of education, traditionally, when students go for higher education they cannot purchase all the books they consult for their courses, they have to take help of library. Generally, due to stock shortage they cannot have access to the book till examination and hence their studies suffer. Internet connectivity has brought the library to the computer screen, every student now have equal and fair chance to study and excel. It has brought the uniformity in education system, undue advantage that rich used to hold now no longer exist.
On the flip side, with so many social and economical barriers breached yet the rich are on the positive side of the spectrum and poor on the other side. They use their resources to have better access to the technology. While, poor is trying hard to build a house in his village whereas rich is planning to spend holidays on the moon. Moreover, advanced technical innovations such as electric car by tesla are usually highly priced so only rich can afford them, before it become available to others they already have taken ta eough benefit to have a ahead start in their life. Further, technology became a new business for the rich, they try to create a false impression of their product through fake promotions and average business person cannot compete with them.
In conclusion, economical divde is centuries old, it will take some time to dismantle it completely. Knowledge is a new wealth and technology is the new weapon. It has given strength to weaker sections which will increase in near future. Sooner or latter new classes will emerge and old classes will get extinct.
- You participated in a sports event as a team member in a foreign country Now you have come back to your home country and you want to recommend the same activity to your friend Write a letter to your friend In your letter Describe the activities you di 87
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say it is ok to use animal for our benefit, others says it is not good to exploit them. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion. 78
- Nowadays young people know less about tradition and culture than in past What are the reasons for it what can be done to improve this situation 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ystem, undue advantage that rich used to hold now no longer exist. On the flip...
^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ady have taken ta eough benefit to have a ahead start in their life. Further, tec...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85217391304 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62599337582 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7343472225 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145363219247 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392191026218 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426463902941 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907981225835 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531296505556 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.