Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today's life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is widely held belief that understanding our history provides no useful information to the current period. However, there is a strong counter-argument from sections of people that knowing about history unlock several mysterious questions and paves the way for building for great future. In my perspective, it is highly recommended to know about our ancestors’ lifestyle and how they build their community under extreme conditions.
First of all, let us look at the benefits of understanding the history. A person, who does not about know anything about the past, cannot acquire commendable knowledge about future. Hence, it is imperative to analyse the history. A large sector of people dedicates their entire lifetime analysing our history on various aspects such as how civilisations came into existence, how dangerous wildlife went to extinction and many more. Besides, there are several monument secrets yet to be discovered. It is still unknown to us how the gigantic pyramids were built without the existence of sophisticated machines.
Another point worth noting is what we should do with the past knowledge. We should not keep circling on observations as it does not provide any good to us and obviously, we should look out for the potential opportunities to transform into next level of lifestyle. If we keep speaking about the past, the future will not wait for us. We should consider History as our stepping stone to create a prosperous future. With the contemporary technology, we should strive to achieve excellence instead of speaking the old stories.
To sum up, I would definitely vouch for learning history as it provides extensive knowledge about the past, which will help us enormously in our future inventions. As the saying goes, Old is Good, it is a precious piece of information which holds the key to unlock the future secrets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-12 | Basheer Ahmed | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you thing might be effective? 61
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care. Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 61
- Some people believe that dangerous sport should be banned. Do you agree of disagree? 56
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today's life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- In last 20 years, there have been significant developments in the field of information technology. For example, the world wide web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative impacts than positive in futu 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended knowing'.
Suggestion: recommended knowing
...future. In my perspective, it is highly recommended to know about our ancestors' lifestyle and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, look, so, still, speaking about, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19536423841 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97689485651 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8194253889 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13707563578 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438872086739 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359045606431 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083621483909 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237625606107 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.