Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both views and give

Essay topics:

Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a group of people which believe that while hiring employers should consider people with innovative thinking and who can run a one man show without any dependencies. Whereas, the other group is of the view that companies should hire who are capable of working as a team player and are flexible to adhere instructions. I shall discuss both perspective in detail in the following paragraphs before reaching a final verdict.
Predominantly, an evident reason of companies hiring innovative and independent resources is the capability to think out of the box. in running days companies look forward to hire people with proactive approach against certain problem statement and who do not consider obstacles as a dead lock to achieve certain goals. For instance, Bill Gates rightly said, do not hire people who have a smart and quick approach to solve a problem, and rather hire those who have easy and lazy solutions as they will find convenient way which involves least effort.
On the contrary, owing to the nature of work there are still companies prefer to hire people who work as team players and follow certain guidelines. For instance in a factory where resources are supposed to pack clothes in a bag, there is no innovation involved but team work is of paramount importance with adherence to supervisor guidelines. People having characteristics of working in isolation and reluctant in abiding the instructions would not be a fit for these types of jobs.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, many companies prefer innovative and analytical skills and other prefers team players. I opine that both approaches are appropriate. Resource selection is directly proportional to the nature of work a person has to do. In companies like Facebook or Apple, innovative and proactive mindset resource would be a best match whereas in factories team players and working under predefined guidelines would be the best suit.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-09 mdsameerR 56 view
2019-11-09 mdsameerR 56 view
2019-02-19 Zeeq1982 52 view
2018-07-15 hardik_21 84 view
Essays by user Zeeq1982 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...the capability to think out of the box. in running days companies look forward to ...
^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'involves the least'.
Suggestion: involves the least
... as they will find convenient way which involves least effort. On the contrary, owing to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...and proactive mindset resource would be a best match whereas in factories team pl...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, still, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in fact, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15923566879 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92356687898 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.548761555 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374471561074 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12819337986 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841469426726 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231337453675 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100989245707 0.056905535591 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.