In order for companies to be successful, they need to hire the right set of people. While some people believe that they should recruit individuals who are creative and can work on their own, others argue that workers who are good team players and can follow the given instructions should be given priority. In my opinion, a company should have a right mix of both these types of staff.
On the one hand, those who argue that companies should hire self-motivated and highly talented resources as these types of employees usually come up with unique ideas. These ideas help companies to stand out tall in the market. Additionally, such employees are always passionate and enthusiastic about their work and do not need any kind of supervision.
On the other hand, others insist that it is better for companies to have staff who are good team members and can follow commands. Undeniably, the majority of the work that happens in companies today is executed by a bunch of people working in a team. In fact, being a team player is so crucial these days that this vital quality is accessed during the time when an employee is interviewed for a job position.
Personally, I feel that an organisation should have a right combination of these sets of people. Having only innovative people will not benefit companies as these employees will need team members who can follow their directions and give life to their ideas.
To recapitulate, although people have different views about what kind of employees a company should hire. I believe that a company needs to have experimental employees as well as the ones with great team capabilities. Since both these types of employees have different strengths and for a company to run successfully, both of these types of workers are required.
- Recently you have traveled by plane and during the journey you had an issue with one of airline employees Write a letter to the company manager and say Give details of your flight Describe the issue you have encountered What do you expect the 47
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both views a 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollow commands. Undeniably, the majority of the work that happens in companies to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, while, i feel, in fact, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68585589569 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483766233766 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.550150483 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325401110094 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120043367165 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921528673606 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199700178398 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711866170958 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.