Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one? - Correct errors
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In most schools around the world, students have their own mobile phone. While these devices can undoubtedly play a role in safety, connectedness, and even learning, many schools have chosen to restrict their use on campus. In my view, this is a positive step and can bring benefits not only academically but physically and socially too.
Restricting phone use in the classroom itself can improve learning. This is simply because, without these devices, there are far fewer distractions for teachers and students. When a student has their phone in their lap or pocket, for instance, there is an irresistible urge to check constantly for texts, alerts or social media updates. Even the most observant teacher cannot prevent them from sneakily checking their messages or scrolling through this irrelevant material during the lesson. These endless distractions draw attention away from important educational matters and erode attention spans, which can have long-term effects on academic progress. A blanket ban on phones during class frees learners from this compulsive checking and allows them to focus.
In addition to banning phones in the classroom, a school that restricts their use outside the class can also expect improvements in student wellbeing. Indeed, if phones are banned at lunchtime and recess, children are forced to engage in a more meaningful and perhaps active way with their classmates. They may play games sports or simply sit and chat together, activities that are far healthier than sitting alone hunched over a screen.
Without limitations enforced by the school children simply cannot draw the line on their phone use. These social and physical benefits are only possible with strict mobile rules.
In conclusion, despite phones are a part of our modern lives, I strongly feel that their use in schools should be limited. With firm boundaries and bans in some situations, students are able to learn better, strengthen friendships, and engage in healthier pursuits.
- You are working for a company You need to take some time off work and want to ask your manager about this Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to take time off work give details of the amount of time you need suggest how your 78
- You want to sell your TV You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain why you are selling the TV Describe the TV Suggest a date when your friend can come and see it 75
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one Correct errors Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after Other people disagree however saying that this depends on a child s circumstances Consider these opposing views and give your own opinion 67
- Write a letter to a friend expressing your interest to seek employment in a different country Your letter should include Why you want to work in a different country What type of work you will be looking for Questions you have about working in a different 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 201, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... situations, students are able to learn better, strengthen friendships, and engage in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34285714286 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67851487301 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4085975491 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234603114878 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827764837633 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602106189814 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13927451293 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531501385424 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.