It is true that the human race has achieved many remarkable results in the field of agriculture from automated irrigation systems to in-house farms. Despite these astonishing achievements, poor people from all around the world still starve to death. The main reasons for this problem perhaps are the financial status of poor countries and the time it takes to implement these technological advances. Support from developed countries is needed in order to tackle this problem.
There are a variety of reasons for this problem. Firstly, although technology has helped scientists make progress in agriculture, it is nearly impossible for poor countries to afford the technology required to end famine. Consequently, the poor cannot get clean and quality food which results in starvation. Furthermore, it takes time to implement all these advances to rest of the world. Secondly, farmable soil on our planet is declining dramatically, meaning that less food will be produced. For example, the proportion of usable soil in Vietnam has decreased 2% during the last 2 years which lead to a 5% rise in the death of hunger.
Governments all over the world have to take action right now before it is too late. Instead of spending on the military, authorities should allocate more money to deliver aid and support to help developed countries and alleviate the gap with poor countries. For instance, Russia and Thailand provided Vietnam with food and facilities to overcome a difficult period in the past after the American war. In addition, people should also be more aware of how the soil degradation situation human are coping with at present.
In conclusion, while scientists have made advances in agriculture, people still suffer from hunger. This is due to the financial status of poor countries and soil degradation, which can be deal with by raising awareness and help from stronger countries.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 79
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21241830065 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82640444585 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6767445904 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188242672227 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650013081136 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592642569823 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12407510784 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635966951401 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.