The provided pie charts represent comparative data about the percentage of British students capable of speaking foreign languages other than English at a particular university in England, in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the proportions of students in each sector changed significantly from 2000 to 2010. While the figures of all other categories increased, the percentage of French-speaking students declined and that of students who only speak German remained unchanged.
As can be seen from the charts, the proportion of students who were able to speak Spanish decreased by half from 20% in 2000 to just 10% in 2010. The figure of French only category also saw a fall from 15% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. Notably, the number of students who can speak German remained the same throughout the years.
In contrast, the ratio of English speaking only students was 30%, but this rose to 35% in 2010. The percentage of another language and two other languages sectors also went up by 5% in 2010.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Task 1: The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73774865762 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5509758788 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416407673832 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174116510455 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851505545767 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256371192446 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648781267393 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.