In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem

Currently, there is a lot of advancements done in agriculture sector. Nevertheless, hunger issue still becomes something unavoidable in this world. This essay will explain the reason why the hunger issue still occurs and also the possible solutions for it.

Firstly, hunger problem exists because there is social imbalance in the world. While others can enjoy the result of current agriculture advancement, there are people who can't even afford buying meal. These people are usually those who suffer from poverty and live in underdeveloped country. Next, weather and climate condition also holds a role in this issue. Some countries often experience extreme weathers which result to the poor food production. Thus, agriculture advancement can't affect maximally because their weather condition does not support it. For instance, it happens in a country which often experiences floods that destroy the crops and also country which lacks adequate rainfall and suffice sunshine to make their crops grow.

There are some possible solutions to solve this problem. Firstly, the developed countries can help the underdeveloped countries by sharing their food supplies to reduce the social imbalance. Moreover, United Nations can also help aiding food supplies to their country members that experience hunger problem. Next, developed countries also help by sharing their latest agriculture invention which is too expensive too be purchased by underdeveloped country. This latest agriculture invention can help overcoming the weather and climate problem that occur in their countries, so the crops can grow well and the famine problem can be overcome.

In conclusion, hunger issue still exists despite of the advancement in agriculture because there is social imbalance in the world and there is weather and climate problem. However, there are some possible solutions to tackle this issue which include developed countries sharing their food supplies to reduce social imbalance and sharing their latest agriculture invention to underdeveloped country to overcome climate problem.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...lture advancement, there are people who cant even afford buying meal. These people a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
..., there are people who cant even afford buying meal. These people are usually those wh...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...oduction. Thus, agriculture advancement cant affect maximally because their weather ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to aid' or 'aid'.
Suggestion: to aid; aid
... Moreover, United Nations can also help aiding food supplies to their country members ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to be'?
Suggestion: to be
...ulture invention which is too expensive too be purchased by underdeveloped country. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to overcome' or 'overcome'.
Suggestion: to overcome; overcome
...s latest agriculture invention can help overcoming the weather and climate problem that oc...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66346153846 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73692989614 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448717948718 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4084667134 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.941176471 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225541599239 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895142817661 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605907474166 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161991881388 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046128833374 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.