It has been seen since last few decay that trades between two nations with their own ways of living’s style is getting increased. Majority of people believe that it is very much required, whereas, some argue that it’s creating negative effects in their national individuality. In my opinion, there are positive impact is persisting more while doing interaction between two communities for their better living. In this essay we will discuss why this kind of relationship is necessary for better future.
Whenever a country interacts with each other for more jobs opportunities and increase their life style, it does not mean they leave their basic nature and rituals of his motherland. Culture and religion of any body’s country will not get effected by any trade done by different countries people. That relationship is only increase the better way of doing any task and increase productivity of their work. It has been observed in many places, where people travel to another country for earning and come back and continue his living with their roots.
Moreover, welcoming people from outside country will definitely increase in tourism and raise the nation’s income as well. It has been seen where local people does not have many option available in their home country except of ancient monuments and natural resources which help them to earn money by the means of outsiders visitor to see that places.
People who come from different origin does affect any of the country with their culture and religion but some time influence others and themselves for better development, which any is good for both of the countries and their natives.
In conclusion, despite of having various difference in culture and thinking, interaction between different countries does not effects root values but increase a person’s life style and national income with ample of opportunities.
- There is a disagreement on the impact of increased business and culture contact between countries on a country s identity What is your opinion 79
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 56
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun decay seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little decay'.
Suggestion: little decay
It has been seen since last few decay that trades between two nations with th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... continue his living with their roots. Moreover, welcoming people from outside ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...on between different countries does not effects root values but increase a person'...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28712871287 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70765480178 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0823223464 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224930039165 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937183246884 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586307834038 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138875170657 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368598988654 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.